Lone ranger decision making versus consensus decision making: Descriptive analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Lung Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Descriptive Decision-Making Framework
The need of shared decision-making has been discussed by researchers since last few decades and is being practiced in several fields. Medical field is also experiencing its consequent positive impact. Keeping this ongoing trend in mind, this paper proposes a theory-based approach of descriptive decision-making (DM) under the realm of uncertainty along with its application to DM of treatment alt...
متن کاملConsensus Decision Making by Fish
Decisions reached through consensus are often more accurate, because they efficiently utilize the diverse information possessed by group members [1-3]. A trust in consensus decision making underlies many of our democratic political and judicial institutions [4], as well as the design of web tools such as Google, Wikipedia, and prediction markets [5, 6]. In theory, consensus for the option favor...
متن کاملConsensus decision making in animals.
Individual animals routinely face decisions that are crucial to their fitness. In social species, however, many of these decisions need to be made jointly with other group members because the group will split apart unless a consensus is reached. Here, we review empirical and theoretical studies of consensus decision making, and place them in a coherent framework. In particular, we classify cons...
متن کاملNormative and Descriptive Aspects of Decision Making
The problems of human behavior in decision processes are central in this chapter. The gaps between the requirements of decision methods and the possibilities of human information processing systems are analyzed. The qualitative model describing the decision maker’s behavior is proposed. The model defines the guidelines for the construction of decision methods justified from behavior point of vi...
متن کاملDescriptive analysis of immunization policy decision making in the Americas.
OBJECTIVES Reducing and eliminating vaccine-preventable diseases requires evidence-based and informed policy decision making. Critical to determining the functionality of the decision-making process for introduction of a new vaccine is understanding the role of the national immunization technical advisory group (ITAG) in each country. The aim of this study is to document the current situation o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Governance and Regulation
سال: 2015
ISSN: 2306-6784,2220-9352
DOI: 10.22495/jgr_v4_i4_c4_p12